SiteNow - Static Site Publisher
Import any static website in 30 seconds. Publish instantly and edit visually with powerful tools. No coding required. Perfect for landing pages, portfolios, and static sites. Try it free today!
StackScope records what new websites are built with, the week they launch. Most we find ourselves, by watching public internet infrastructure for brand-new sites; the rest come from Product Hunt, Hacker News and PeerPush. We crawled this one for its tech stack and scored it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 13 April 2026; the live site may have changed since.
Every technology below links to its own page: which other new sites launched with it. Vendors and agencies watch those pages with Stackdar and hear about new adopters the week they ship, from £15 a month.
SiteNow - Static Site Publisher has the basics covered well, with complete legal pages, a thorough launch checklist, and clean crawl signals. What needs work: missing several security headers, tracking cookies set before any opt-in, and no email security records.
Launched on Product Hunt on April 1, 2026. The domain was registered 10 weeks before launch. Our crawler found 10 technologies on this site, covering advertising, analytics, CSS frameworks, and developer tools. The stack includes Tailwind CSS, Vue.js, and Google AdSense.
It's also running the same core stack as 309 other launches.
If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →
Tech Stack (10)
| DNS |
|
| Security | HSTS (2) |
| Server |
|
| CSS framework |
|
| Developer tools |
|
| Font |
|
| Framework |
|
| Advertising |
|
| Analytics |
|
| SEO |
|
Infrastructure
Email Security
Readiness Breakdown How?
Vibe Score Breakdown How?
| Signal | Points |
|---|---|
| AI copy signals | +5 |
| AI palette signals | +5 |
| Implausible social-proof claim | +15 |
| AI layout signals | +5 |
This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.
