We're live on Product Hunt. If you have found StackScope useful, a comment would mean a lot. See the launch

← Back to browse

Patentbrief

Plain-English summaries of landmark patents. Understand what any patent actually covers — and what it doesn't. Based in Phoenix, AZ.

Added June 23, 2026 · Last analysed June 23, 2026 · via Hacker News · also on Product Hunt

StackScope records what new websites are built with, the week they launch. Most we find ourselves, by watching public internet infrastructure for brand-new sites; the rest come from Product Hunt, Hacker News and PeerPush. We crawled this one for its tech stack and scored it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 23 June 2026; the live site may have changed since.

Every technology below links to its own page: which other new sites launched with it. Vendors and agencies watch those pages with Stackdar and hear about new adopters the week they ship, from £15 a month.

Patentbrief ships with the launch fundamentals in place, with complete legal pages, a thorough launch checklist, and fast page loads. Worth fixing first: no Content-Security-Policy, tracking cookies set before any opt-in, and no email security records.

Launched on Hacker News on June 23, 2026. The site is hosted on Vercel. The crawl picked up 15 technologies on this site, covering javascript library, video, analytics, and DNS providers. The stack includes Next.js, React, and Bing Webmaster.

For context, it's running the same core stack as 3,395 other launches and tighter on security headers than most Hacker News launches.

If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →

9.5
StackScope Score
Excellent
100/100 Launch Readiness
Launch ready
3/3* Legal
Complete*
2/2 Crawl files
Complete
Vibe Score 50 · Many AI signals
How much the site looks AI-generated. Informational pattern-match signal, not a verdict. Does not feed the StackScope Score. See which fingerprints fired →

Tech Stack (15) · Indie stack

Infrastructure
DNS Name.com
Hosting Vercel (2)
Security HSTS
Email
Transactional email Resend
Build & Framework
Framework React
JavaScript library GSAP
Lenis
Motion
Three.js
Meta-framework Next.js (5)
Video Remotion
YouTube
Analytics & Marketing
Analytics Google Analytics (6)
SEO Bing Webmaster
Tag management Google Tag Manager (4)

Infrastructure

Network
AS16509 · US
DNS
Name.com
Authoritative nameserver
DNSSEC
Not enabled
DNS responses unsigned. Cache-poisoning vulnerable.
Green hosting
Not green hosted
No green-energy record. Data from The Green Web Foundation.
SSL Certificate
Let's Encrypt
Valid 28 May 2026 to 26 Aug 2026
Certificate as captured in this snapshot, not a live check.

Email Security

SPF Not published. Your domain can be spoofed in phishing emails.
DKIM Detected via known email provider
DMARC Not published. Receivers fall back to permissive defaults.
?
MTA-STS Not deployed. Mail to your domain can be downgraded to plaintext en route.
?
TLS-RPT Not configured. You won't hear about silent SMTP TLS handshake failures.

Storage (2)

Cookies (2)
NameLifetimeDetected as
_ga 1y Google Analytics
_ga_0TNMVSJCWE 1y Google Analytics

Readiness Breakdown How?

Custom title and meta description
Open Graph tags (title, image, description)
Twitter card meta tags
Canonical URL declared
Responsive viewport meta tag
Favicon present
Semantic HTML (nav, main, article)

Performance How?

98 ms Server response
94% Faster than peers
436 ms Largest contentful paint
0.00 Cumulative layout shift
1.0 MB Page weight
5 KB Image weight
2 Third-party domains
0 Console errors
0 Failed requests

32 images: 32 without width/height, 32 missing alt text

Indicative grade from a single automated render, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data, and not part of the StackScope score.

Vibe Score Breakdown How?

SignalPoints
AI CSS signals +15
AI onboarding signals +5
AI palette signals +5
AI writing signals +5
AI asset signals +10
Default scaffold favicon +10

This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.

AI Stance

Welcomes AI crawlers
llms.txt published
No AI bots blocked in robots.txt
? No directive declared
? None advertised

Well-Known Files

robots.txt
sitemap.xml (5307 URLs)
security.txt
llms.txt
ads.txt
humans.txt
Privacy Policy
/privacy
Terms of Service
/patent-licensing
? Consent manager not detected
Analytics set tracking cookies on our visit, with no opt-in step.
92% unique

Security Headers (5/6)

Permissions-Policy experimental (check browser support)
Content-Security-Policy report-only, so nothing is enforced yet
X-XSS-Protection deprecated (use Content-Security-Policy)

Build

Code splitting
45 JS files
1 CSS files
2 Third-party domains

Brand Colours

Something not look right? If a technology shown here is wrong or out of date, email [email protected] and we'll review it.