Navos AI
Navos is the AI strategy advisor for business and investment decisions. It watches your markets and your risks, then tells you what needs attention now.
Estimated origin: United States
Added April 17, 2026
· Last analysed April 17, 2026 · via 
· 67% unique tagline
StackScope is a free public catalogue of indie launches. We find launches on Product Hunt, Hacker News and similar feeds, then crawl each site to detect its tech stack and score it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 17 April 2026; the live site may have changed since.
Navos AI ships with the launch fundamentals in place, with complete legal pages, a complete set of security headers, and a thorough launch checklist. What needs work: incomplete email security.
Launched on Product Hunt on April 17, 2026. The site is hosted on Vercel, with a domain registered 10 months before launch. We've detected 15 technologies on this site, covering AI builders, analytics, animation, and DNS providers. The stack includes Next.js, React, and Apollo.io.
It's running the same core stack as 2,292 other launches and tighter on security headers than most Product Hunt launches.
If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →
Tech Stack (15) · Indie stack
| DNS |
Cloudflare DNS
|
| Hosting |
Vercel
(3)
|
| Security | HSTS (2) |
| Business email |
Microsoft 365
(2)
|
| Transactional email |
Resend
|
| Animation |
LottieFiles
|
| Framework |
React
|
| Meta-framework |
Next.js
(3)
|
| Analytics |
Google Analytics
(3)
|
PostHog
|
|
| SEO |
Google Search Console
|
| Tag management |
Google Tag Manager
(2)
|
| Sales intelligence |
Apollo.io
|
Infrastructure
Email Security
Readiness Breakdown How?
Vibe Score Breakdown How?
| Signal | Points |
|---|---|
| AI palette signals | +5 |
| AI writing signals | +5 |
| Recognised AI builder signature | +100 |
This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.