← Back to browse

Via 1.0

Stop spending energy on planning. Via captures your thoughts and automatically builds a schedule you can follow.

United Kingdom Estimated origin: United Kingdom

Added July 26, 2026 · Last analysed July 26, 2026 · via · 60% unique tagline

StackScope is a free public catalogue of indie launches. We find launches on Product Hunt, Hacker News and similar feeds, then crawl each site to detect its tech stack and score it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 26 July 2026; the live site may have changed since.

Via 1.0 looks production-ready overall, with a thorough launch checklist, well-configured email security, and fast page loads. Worth fixing first: missing several security headers, incomplete legal pages, and tracking cookies set before any opt-in.

Launched on Product Hunt on July 26, 2026. The site is served through Cloudflare. We've detected 15 technologies on this site, covering analytics, security, advertising, and AI builders. The stack includes Cloudflare, Cloudflare Bot Management, and Facebook Pixel.

If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →

Vibe Score 100 · Strong AI signals
How much the site looks AI-generated. Informational pattern-match signal, not a verdict. Does not feed the StackScope Score. See which fingerprints fired →

Tech Stack (15)

Infrastructure
CDN Cloudflare
DNS Porkbun DNS
Protocol HTTP/3
Security Cloudflare Bot Management
HSTS
Email
Business email Proton Mail (3)
Build & Framework
JavaScript library Motion
Video YouTube (2)
Analytics & Marketing
Advertising Facebook Pixel (3)
Analytics Google Analytics (4)
PostHog (5)
SEO Google Search Console
Tag management Google Tag Manager medium
AI & Emerging
AI builder Framer (6)
Other
Directory Product Hunt

Infrastructure

Network
AS16509 · NL
DNS
Porkbun DNS
Authoritative nameserver
DNSSEC
Not enabled
DNS responses unsigned. Cache-poisoning vulnerable.
Green hosting
Not green hosted
No green-energy record. Data from The Green Web Foundation.
SSL Certificate
Let's Encrypt
Valid 29 May 2026 to 27 Aug 2026
Certificate as captured in this snapshot, not a live check.

Email Security

SPF ~all Soft-fail (~all). Common and accepted.
DKIM Detected via known email provider
DMARC p=reject Reject (strict). Strong.
?
MTA-STS Not deployed. Mail to your domain can be downgraded to plaintext en route.
?
TLS-RPT Not configured. You won't hear about silent SMTP TLS handshake failures.

Storage (16)

Cookies (10)
NameLifetimeDetected as
ph_phc_ztvDKpQpysct3qLDLtqWKAsxGXJX2DL7rQreBRNwzjeM_posthog 1y PostHog
VISITOR_INFO1_LIVE 6mo YouTube
VISITOR_PRIVACY_METADATA 6mo YouTube
YSC session -
_fbp 3mo Facebook Pixel
_ga 1y Google Analytics
_ga_RYH9XH2FXG 1y Google Analytics
__cf_bm < 1h Cloudflare
__Secure-ROLLOUT_TOKEN 6mo -
__Secure-YNID 6mo YouTube
Local storage (3)
KeySizeDetected as
lastExternalReferrer 5 B -
lastExternalReferrerTime 13 B -
ph_phc_ztvDKpQpysct3qLDLtqWKAsxGXJX2DL7rQreBRNwzjeM_posthog 1.5 KB PostHog
Session storage (3)
KeySizeDetected as
ph_phc_ztvDKpQpysct3qLDLtqWKAsxGXJX2DL7rQreBRNwzjeM_posthog 388 B PostHog
ph_phc_ztvDKpQpysct3qLDLtqWKAsxGXJX2DL7rQreBRNwzjeM_primary_window_exists 4 B PostHog
ph_phc_ztvDKpQpysct3qLDLtqWKAsxGXJX2DL7rQreBRNwzjeM_window_id 38 B PostHog

Readiness Breakdown How?

Custom title and meta description
Open Graph tags (title, image, description)
Twitter card meta tags
Canonical URL declared
Responsive viewport meta tag
Favicon present
- Semantic HTML (nav, main, article)

Performance How?

97 ms Server response
95% Faster than peers
388 ms Largest contentful paint
0.02 Cumulative layout shift
6.2 MB Page weight
615 KB Image weight
8 Third-party domains
0 Console errors
0 Failed requests

11 images: 10 missing alt text

Indicative grade from a single automated render, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data, and not part of the StackScope score.

Vibe Score Breakdown How?

SignalPoints
AI copy signals +5
AI onboarding signals +5
Recognised AI builder signature +100
AI styling signals +10

This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.

AI Stance

No AI stance declared
llms.txt published
No AI bots blocked in robots.txt
? No directive declared
? None advertised

Well-Known Files

robots.txt
sitemap.xml (16 URLs)
security.txt
llms.txt
ads.txt
humans.txt
Privacy Policy
/privacy-policy
? Terms of Service not detected
? Consent manager not detected
Analytics set tracking cookies on our visit, with no opt-in step.
78% unique

Security Headers (2/6)

Permissions-Policy experimental (check browser support)
X-XSS-Protection deprecated (use Content-Security-Policy)

Build

Code splitting
12 JS files
0 CSS files
8 Third-party domains

Brand Colours

Something not look right? If a technology shown here is wrong or out of date, email [email protected] and we'll review it.