Fenrik.chat
Komplexní SaaS platforma pro správu chatbotů
www.fenrik.chat
· Added June 18, 2026
· Last analysed June 18, 2026 · via 
· 67% unique tagline
StackScope is a free public catalogue of indie launches. We find launches on Product Hunt, Hacker News and similar feeds, then crawl each site to detect its tech stack and score it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 18 June 2026; the live site may have changed since.
Fenrik.chat ships with the basics, with complete legal pages. Worth fixing first: missing several security headers, no robots.txt or sitemap, and incomplete email security.
Launched on Product Hunt on June 18, 2026. The site is hosted on Amazon.com in the United States, with a domain registered 7 months before launch. We've detected 13 technologies on this site, covering analytics, affiliate, consent tooling, and DNS providers. The stack includes Google, Next.js, and React.
It's running the same core stack as 1,583 other launches.
If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →
Tech Stack (13) · Indie stack
| DNS |
Porkbun DNS
|
| Hosting |
Vercel
|
| Security | HSTS |
| Business email |
Google Workspace
(2)
|
| Transactional email |
Resend
|
| Affiliate |
Rewardful
(2)
|
| Analytics |
Contentsquare
(4)
|
Google Analytics
(3)
|
|
| Consent |
Google
|
| SEO |
Google Search Console
|
| Tag management |
Google Tag Manager
|
Infrastructure
Email Security
Storage (4)
| Name | Lifetime | Detected as |
|---|---|---|
| _cs_c | 1y | Contentsquare |
| _cs_id | 1y | Contentsquare |
| _cs_s | < 1h | Contentsquare |
| Cache name | Detected as |
|---|---|
| csPersisted | Contentsquare |
Readiness Breakdown How?
Performance How?
Indicative grade from a single automated render, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data, and not part of the StackScope score.
Vibe Score Breakdown How?
| Signal | Points |
|---|---|
| AI palette signals | +5 |
| AI iconography signals | +3 |
| AI layout signals | +5 |
This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.