← Back to browse

AccessDocs

Create, send and get paid in under 60 seconds. No sign-up required. Built for UK small businesses.

Finance
United Kingdom Estimated origin: United Kingdom

Added June 11, 2026 · Last analysed June 11, 2026 · via PeerPush

StackScope records what new websites are built with, the week they launch. Most we find ourselves, by watching public internet infrastructure for brand-new sites; the rest come from Product Hunt, Hacker News and PeerPush. We crawled this one for its tech stack and scored it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 11 June 2026; the live site may have changed since.

Every technology below links to its own page: which other new sites launched with it. Vendors and agencies watch those pages with Stackdar and hear about new adopters the week they ship, from £15 a month.

AccessDocs looks production-ready overall, with complete legal pages, well-configured email security, and clean crawl signals. What needs work: missing several security headers.

Launched on PeerPush on June 11, 2026. The site is hosted on Google Cloud, with a domain registered 7 weeks before launch. We've detected 13 technologies on this site, covering advertising, AI builders, analytics, and CSS frameworks. The stack includes Bootstrap, Google Ads, and Google Analytics.

It's on a stack we've seen on only 8 launches.

If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →

Vibe Score 100 · Strong AI signals
How much the site looks AI-generated. Informational pattern-match signal, not a verdict. Does not feed the StackScope Score. See which fingerprints fired →

Tech Stack (13)

Infrastructure
DNS Name.com
Hosting Google Cloud
Protocol HTTP/3
Security HSTS
Email
Business email Google Workspace (3)
Build & Framework
CSS framework Bootstrap
Font Google Fonts
Package CDN jsDelivr
Analytics & Marketing
Advertising Google Ads (3)
Analytics Google Analytics
SEO Google Search Console
Tag management Google Tag Manager
AI & Emerging
AI builder Replit (2)

Infrastructure

DNS
Name.com
Authoritative nameserver
DNSSEC
Not enabled
DNS responses unsigned. Cache-poisoning vulnerable.
Green hosting
Green hosted
Host runs on renewable energy. Data from The Green Web Foundation.
SSL Certificate
Let's Encrypt
Valid 22 Apr 2026 to 21 Jul 2026
Certificate as captured in this snapshot, not a live check.
Domain Age
4 months
Registered Apr 2026 · Name.com, Inc.

Email Security

SPF ~all Soft-fail (~all). Common and accepted.
DKIM Detected via known email provider
DMARC p=reject Reject (strict). Strong.
?
MTA-STS Not deployed. Mail to your domain can be downgraded to plaintext en route.
?
TLS-RPT Not configured. You won't hear about silent SMTP TLS handshake failures.

Storage (3)

Cookies (2)
NameLifetimeDetected as
GAESA 29d -
_gcl_au 3mo Google Ads
Local storage (1)
KeySizeDetected as
_gcl_ls 152 B Google Ads

Readiness Breakdown How?

Custom title and meta description
Open Graph tags (title, image, description) (partial) missing og:image
Twitter card meta tags
Canonical URL declared
Responsive viewport meta tag
Favicon present
Page title is 71 characters (advisory) Google only shows about 60 characters of the title in search results; aim for 50–60 to keep the whole thing visible.
- Semantic HTML (nav, main, article)

Performance How?

1224 ms Server response
7% Faster than peers
548 ms Largest contentful paint
0.00 Cumulative layout shift
1.5 MB Page weight
845 KB Image weight
5 Third-party domains
0 Console errors
0 Failed requests

1 images: 1 oversized

Indicative grade from a single automated render, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data, and not part of the StackScope score.

Vibe Score Breakdown How?

SignalPoints
AI copy signals +5
AI writing signals +5
AI code-structure signals +5
Recognised AI builder signature +100
AI layout signals +5
AI CSS signals +15

This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.

AI Stance

No AI stance declared
llms.txt published
No AI bots blocked in robots.txt
? No directive declared
? None advertised

Well-Known Files

robots.txt
sitemap.xml (6 URLs)
security.txt
llms.txt
ads.txt
humans.txt
Privacy Policy
/privacy
Terms of Service
/terms
? Analytics present, but it set no tracking cookies on our visit (it may be opt-in-gated).
82% unique

Security Headers (1/6)

Permissions-Policy experimental (check browser support)
X-XSS-Protection deprecated (use Content-Security-Policy)

Build

2 JS files
2 CSS files
5 Third-party domains

Brand Colours

Something not look right? If a technology shown here is wrong or out of date, email [email protected] and we'll review it.