New: The State of Indie Launches: July 2026. The framework layer is the same everywhere. The payment layer is not. Read

← Back to browse

Comparion® AHP Software for Teams

Expert Choice Comparion® is AHP software for prioritization and resource optimization. Get better decisions in less time. Reduce risk. Improve your communication and collaboration.

Productivity

Added August 11, 2026 · Last analysed August 11, 2026 · via

StackScope is a free public catalogue of indie launches. We find launches on Product Hunt, Hacker News and similar feeds, then crawl each site to detect its tech stack and score it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 11 August 2026; the live site may have changed since.

Comparion® AHP Software for Teams looks production-ready overall, with well-configured email security, fast page loads, and clean crawl signals. Visible gaps: no Permissions-Policy and incomplete legal pages.

Launched on Product Hunt on August 11, 2026. The site is served through Cloudflare, with a domain registered in 1996. We've detected 17 technologies on this site, covering analytics, business email, security, and advertising. The stack includes Google, Ahrefs, and Cloudflare.

It's more locked down than the typical Product Hunt launch.

If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →

7.9
StackScope Score
Good
78/100 Launch Readiness
Well prepared
2/3 Legal
Partial
2/2 Crawl files
Complete
Vibe Score 40 · Some AI signals
How much the site looks AI-generated. Informational pattern-match signal, not a verdict. Does not feed the StackScope Score. See which fingerprints fired →

Tech Stack (17)

Infrastructure
CDN Cloudflare (2)
DNS Cloudflare DNS
Security Cloudflare Bot Management
HSTS
Email
Business email Deliverability Manager
Microsoft 365 (3)
Email marketing HubSpot (8)
Transactional email SendGrid
Build & Framework
Font Google Fonts
JavaScript library jQuery
Analytics & Marketing
Advertising Google Ads
Analytics Ahrefs
Google Analytics (3)
Smartlook (2)
Consent Google
SEO LinkedIn (3)
Tag management Google Tag Manager (3)

Infrastructure

Network
AS13335 · US
DNS
Cloudflare DNS
Authoritative nameserver
DNSSEC
Not enabled
DNS responses unsigned. Cache-poisoning vulnerable.
Green hosting
Green hosted
Host runs on renewable energy. Data from The Green Web Foundation.
SSL Certificate
Google Trust Services
Valid 12 Jul 2026 to 10 Oct 2026
Certificate as captured in this snapshot, not a live check.
Domain Age
30.3 years
Registered Apr 1996 · 1API GmbH

Email Security

SPF -all Strict (-all). Strong.
DKIM Detected via known email provider
DMARC p=quarantine Quarantine (moderate)
?
MTA-STS Not deployed. Mail to your domain can be downgraded to plaintext en route.
?
TLS-RPT Not configured. You won't hear about silent SMTP TLS handshake failures.

Storage (6)

Cookies (5)
NameLifetimeDetected as
bcookie 12mo LinkedIn
lidc 23h LinkedIn
li_gc 5mo LinkedIn
_cfuvid session Cloudflare
__cf_bm < 1h Cloudflare
IndexedDB (1)
DatabaseVersionDetected as
hs-cta-interactions 1 HubSpot

Readiness Breakdown How?

Custom title and meta description
Open Graph tags (title, image, description) (partial) missing og:image
Twitter card meta tags
Canonical URL declared
Responsive viewport meta tag
Favicon present
Meta description is 181 characters (advisory) Google only shows about 155–160 characters of the description in desktop search results (less on mobile); anything past that won't appear.
- Semantic HTML (nav, main, article)

Performance How?

109 ms Server response
82% Faster than peers
1180 ms Largest contentful paint
0.30 Cumulative layout shift
5.2 MB Page weight
2.2 MB Image weight
15 Third-party domains
0 Console errors
0 Failed requests

67 images: 10 oversized, 48 without width/height, 5 missing alt text

Indicative grade from a single automated render, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data, and not part of the StackScope score.

Vibe Score Breakdown How?

SignalPoints
AI code-structure signals +5
AI CSS signals +15

This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.

AI Stance

No AI stance declared
llms.txt published
No AI bots blocked in robots.txt
? No directive declared
? None advertised

Well-Known Files

robots.txt
sitemap.xml (90 URLs)
security.txt
llms.txt
ads.txt
humans.txt
Privacy Policy
/legal
? Terms of Service not detected
Consent manager: Google

Security Headers (5/6)

Permissions-Policy experimental (check browser support)
X-XSS-Protection deprecated (use Content-Security-Policy)

Build

Code splitting
45 JS files
6 CSS files
15 Third-party domains

Brand Colours

Something not look right? If a technology shown here is wrong or out of date, email [email protected] and we'll review it.