Opportify Fraud Protection
Score every submission across 100+ signals: email, IP, device, behavior, and content. Form Fraud Protection or Fraud Protection API. 14-day free trial.
Estimated origin: United States
StackScope is a free public catalogue of indie launches. We find launches on Product Hunt, Hacker News and similar feeds, then crawl each site to detect its tech stack and score it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 18 August 2026; the live site may have changed since.
Opportify Fraud Protection scores highly overall, with complete legal pages, a thorough launch checklist, and well-configured email security. Main gaps: no Permissions-Policy.
Launched on PeerPush on August 18, 2026. The site is hosted on AWS S3 and served through AWS CloudFront, with a domain registered in 2024. The crawl picked up 32 technologies on this site, covering seo, advertising, analytics, and business email. The stack includes CookieYes, Next.js, and React.
For context, it's on one of the most common stacks we track, shared by 104 launches and more locked down than the typical PeerPush launch.
If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →
Tech Stack (32) · Scale-up stack
| CDN |
AWS CloudFront
|
| Cloud |
Amazon Web Services
|
| DNS |
AWS Route 53
|
| Hosting |
AWS S3
|
| Security |
AWS WAF
|
| HSTS |
| Business email |
GoDaddy Email
|
Microsoft 365
(3)
|
|
| Email marketing | ActiveCampaign |
HubSpot
|
| CSS framework |
Tailwind CSS
|
| Framework |
React
|
| Meta-framework |
Next.js
(3)
|
| Video |
Vimeo
|
| Advertising |
Bing Ads
|
Google Ads
(3)
|
|
X (Twitter) Ads
|
|
| Analytics |
Google Analytics
(5)
|
Microsoft Clarity
|
|
Mouseflow
(2)
|
|
| Consent |
CookieYes
|
| SEO | Geo Meta Tags |
Google Search Console
|
|
LinkedIn
|
|
Yahoo Search
|
|
| Social |
Reddit
|
X (Twitter)
|
|
| Tag management |
Google Tag Manager
(5)
|
| AI builder |
Cursor
|
Infrastructure
Email Security
Storage (9)
| Name | Lifetime | Detected as |
|---|---|---|
| aws-waf-token | 4d | AWS WAF |
| test_cookie | < 1h | - |
| _ga | 1y | Google Analytics |
| _ga_8ZP3X6HXBZ | 1y | Google Analytics |
| _gcl_au | 2mo | Google Ads |
| _op_attr | 1mo | - |
| Key | Size | Detected as |
|---|---|---|
| flowbite-theme-mode | 5 B | - |
| _gcl_ls | 277 B | Google Ads |
| Key | Size | Detected as |
|---|---|---|
| _op_attr_lp | 1 B | - |
Readiness Breakdown How?
Performance How?
⚠ 2 images: 2 without width/height, 2 missing alt text
Broken first-party requests (4), worth fixing
- 405 /source-website?ga_client_id=744286835.1787085376&landing_page=%2Fproducts%2Ffraud-protection&first_seen=2026-08-18T20%3A36%3A12.621Z
- net::ERR_FAILED /intel/v1/init
- 405 /api/request-info
- 405 /source-website?landing_page=%2Fproducts%2Ffraud-protection&first_seen=2026-08-18T20%3A36%3A12.621Z
Indicative grade from a single automated render, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data, and not part of the StackScope score.
Vibe Score Breakdown How?
| Signal | Points |
|---|---|
| AI copy signals | +5 |
| AI palette signals | +5 |
| AI writing signals | +5 |
| Recognised AI builder signature | +100 |
This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.