← Back to browse

GoodBarber - AI Extension Builder

Describe a feature, AI creates it in your app

www.goodbarber.com · Added June 24, 2026 · Last analysed June 24, 2026 · via · 71% unique tagline

StackScope is a free public catalogue of indie launches. We find launches on Product Hunt, Hacker News and similar feeds, then crawl each site to detect its tech stack and score it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 24 June 2026; the live site may have changed since.

GoodBarber - AI Extension Builder ships with the launch fundamentals in place, with complete legal pages, a thorough launch checklist, and clean crawl signals. Worth fixing first: no Permissions-Policy and incomplete email security.

Launched on Product Hunt on June 24, 2026. The site is hosted on Cogent Communications in the United States, with a domain registered in 2009. The crawl picked up 23 technologies on this site, covering advertising, marketing, analytics, and consent tooling. The stack includes Cookiebot, Google, and Apple App Store.

For context, it's tighter on security headers than most Product Hunt launches.

If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →

9.5
StackScope Score
Excellent
100/100 Launch Readiness
Launch ready
3/3 Legal
Complete
2/2 Web Standards
Complete
Vibe Score 5 · Few AI signals
Informational pattern-match signal. Does not feed the StackScope Score. See which fingerprints fired →

Tech Stack (23)

Infrastructure
CDN Cloudflare
Security Cloudflare Bot Management
HSTS
Server nginx
Email
Email marketing Mailchimp (2)
Transactional email ZeptoMail
AI & Emerging
AI service OpenAI
Other
Mobile Apple App Store

Infrastructure

DNSSEC
Not enabled
DNS responses unsigned. Cache-poisoning vulnerable.
SSL Certificate
Gandi SAS
Valid 3 Sep 2025 to 4 Oct 2026
Certificate as captured in this snapshot, not a live check.
Domain Age
16.5 years
Registered Dec 2009 · OVH sas

Email Security

SPF ~all Soft-fail (~all). Common and accepted.
DKIM Detected via known email provider
DMARC p=none None (p=none). Monitoring only.
?
MTA-STS Not deployed. Mail to your domain can be downgraded to plaintext en route.
?
TLS-RPT Not configured. You won't hear about silent SMTP TLS handshake failures.

Storage (34)

Cookies (24)
NameLifetimeDetected as
csrftoken 12mo -
ttcsid 2mo TikTok Pixel
ttcsid_CPM0JEBC77U4HF2BPD70 2mo TikTok Pixel
X-AB 23h -
_cfuvid session Cloudflare
_fbp 2mo Facebook Pixel
_scid 1y Snapchat Pixel
_scid_r 1y Snapchat Pixel
_ttp 2mo TikTok Pixel
_tt_enable_cookie 2mo TikTok Pixel
__cf_bm < 1h Cloudflare
__insp_nv 12mo Inspectlet
__insp_pad 12mo Inspectlet
__insp_sid 12mo Inspectlet
__insp_slim 12mo Inspectlet
__insp_targlpt 12mo Inspectlet
__insp_targlpu 12mo Inspectlet
__insp_uid 12mo Inspectlet
__insp_wid 12mo Inspectlet
__utma 1y Google Analytics
__utmb < 1h Google Analytics
__utmc session Google Analytics
__utmt_%5Bobject%20Object%5D < 1h Google Analytics
__utmz 6mo Google Analytics
Local storage (5)
KeySizeDetected as
lastExternalReferrer 5 B -
lastExternalReferrerTime 13 B -
u_sclid 64 B UpSellit
u_sclid_r 64 B UpSellit
__insp_session_count 1 B Inspectlet
Session storage (5)
KeySizeDetected as
tt_appInfo 17 B TikTok Pixel
tt_pixel_session_index 20 B TikTok Pixel
tt_sessionId 60 B TikTok Pixel
u_scsid 96 B UpSellit
u_scsid_r 96 B UpSellit

Readiness Breakdown How?

Custom title and meta description
Open Graph tags (title, image, description)
Twitter card meta tags
Canonical URL declared
Responsive viewport meta tag
Favicon present
Semantic HTML (nav, main, article)

Performance How?

508 ms Server response
35% Faster than peers
580 ms Largest contentful paint
0.00 Cumulative layout shift
1.2 MB Page weight
152 KB Image weight
28 Third-party domains
0 Console errors
0 Failed requests

98 images: 18 oversized, 50 without width/height, 46 missing alt text

Indicative grade from a single automated render, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data, and not part of the StackScope score.

Vibe Score Breakdown How?

SignalPoints
AI palette signals +5

This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.

AI Stance

Welcomes AI crawlers
llms.txt published
No AI bots blocked in robots.txt
? No directive declared
? None advertised

Well-Known Files

sitemap.xml (10 URLs)
security.txt
llms.txt
ads.txt
humans.txt
Consent manager: Cookiebot
Shared by 1 other site (identical text)
0% unique

Security Headers (5/6)

Permissions-Policy experimental (check browser support)
X-XSS-Protection deprecated (use Content-Security-Policy)

Build

Code splitting
19 JS files
2 CSS files
28 Third-party domains

Brand Colours

Something not look right? If a technology shown here is wrong or out of date, email [email protected] and we'll review it.